So will Microsoft call it Windows 8.1 or Windows 9?
Share on Twitter.
Get the most reliable SMTP service for your business. You wished you got it sooner!
July 9, 2014
There appears to be a lot of people out there that are confused and uncertain as to which
version of Windows should they choose for their main work computer, and for good reason.
News have already started to propagate about the next version of Windows 8.1, namely update 2 and
even Windows 9 for that matter. So what will Microsoft call it anyway?
Whether or not it bears the name Windows 9 or something else, the next major wave of updates,
codenamed Threshold is due to land on our desktops and mobiles later in 2014.
At any rate, we will try to help you with that confusion.
The upcoming refresh will probably see lots of new features aimed at the pre-Windows 8 – ie, the
tradition desktop – crowd, who are more familiar with input using a mouse and keyboard instead
Threshold will have a Start menu, the ability to run Metro-style-Windows-Store apps in the normal
Windows desktop and offer users the chance to shut off the Metro screen.
Before all that, in April, we had the Windows 8.1 Update 1, which can be seen as a step by Microsoft
to convince enterprises that the operating system is really enterprise ready.
But not everybody is convinced that it is. The update doesn’t offer any real new features, but
rather certain enhancements for the traditional desktop user – giving them a working experience
similar to what they are used to.
If you’re using Windows 8.1 on a tablet or a touch-enabled device, you won't spot much in the
way of difference.
But before we go any further, let’s be honest here. For people in IT who are already very
familiar with Windows, Windows 8 has taken some considerable adjustment.
Switching between new-style apps and traditional desktop apps can be very confusing, and it
takes some time to figure it all out, which can lead to a loss of productivity.
Traditional Windows functions are either missing or so hidden down that it takes three people
to figure them out.
The last thing enterprise IT system admins want to do is deploy a new operating system that
For instance, what does Update 1 do? On the Surface Pro, it didn’t even provide a wow factor. At
first, you don’t even notice when it comes to look and feel. However, if you look closely, you'll
notice that there is a Power button on the Start page! What?
One of our biggest pet peeves with Windows 8 and Windows Server 2012 was how to shut down the
system. Seriously Microsoft, why did you make it so difficult to shut it down?
Shutting down and restarting a computer is a very basic function that should be easy to find
and shouldn’t take more than 60 seconds or less to locate.
Prior to Update 1, powering down your computer or laptop required you to move the mouse to
the lower left-hand corner of your screen, slowly hovering over that corner, right-clicking
the Start button or pressing Windows key and X on your keyboard, then clicking on "Shut down"
or "Sign out" in the case of Windows Server 2012.
Now the Power button is clearly on display in the Start Menu. Something like this shouldn’t have
been made so hard to do.
Another change was the addition of the Search function on the Start page. Just like the Power button
feature, the Search function makes finding software so much easier than before.
On a non-Update 1 system, searching meant you had to swipe your finger in from the right
edge of the screen to start the process, or hover your mouse over the lower-right hand corner
of the screen and then move the cursor up to the Search box to type in your query. AH!
In other IT news
Intel, Samsung, Dell and Broadcom among others, have founded a new group, called the 'Open
Interconnect Consortium' to promote new standards that will help the development of the 'Internet
The new consortium says it “will seek to define a common communication framework based on industry
standard technologies to wirelessly connect and intelligently manage the flow of information
among devices, regardless of form factor, operating system or service provider.”
The new consortium also says “It is our intention to create a specification and an open source
project that will allow interoperability for all types of devices and operating systems.”
So far, we've only got the statement that says “Additional technical details will be announced
at a later time” for now.
The launch comes just six days after Microsoft pledged itself to the Allseen Alliance, another group
that says its aim is “To enable widespread adoption and help accelerate the development and evolution
of an interoperable peer connectivity and communications framework based on AllJoyn for devices and
applications in the Internet of Everything.”
So the question is, are the two groups different? The Open Interconnect Consortium (OIC) offers
the following description of its differences with rivals-- “Today, there are multiple forums driving
different approaches to solve the challenge of IoT connectivity and interoperability. Currently,
we don’t see just one single effort that addresses all the necessary requirements. The companies involved
in OIC believe that secure and reliable device discovery and connectivity is a foundational capability
to enable IoT. The companies also believe that a common, interoperable approach is essential, and that both
a standard and open source implementation are the best route to enable scale.”
That statement seems a little odd as the Allseen Alliance's spiel says its “Members are collaborating
on a universal software framework, based on AllJoyn open source code, that allows devices to autonomously
discover and interact with nearby products regardless of their underlying proprietary technology or
Can the OIC succeed? With just Intel (plus subsidiary Wind River), Dell, Samsung, Broadcom and Amtel
aboard, it trails the Allseen Alliance's fifty members handily.
We are still in the very early days for the Internet of Things, so it's possible that the two
bodies decide they have enough in common to collaborate.
For now, that Microsoft has joined one body and Intel the other may raise some eyebrows, although
with precious little detail of either group's approach available it's difficult to read anything into
the two companies' decisions, at least for now anyway.
In other IT news
It's reported this morning that China's government has finally approved Lenovo’s $2.3 billion
deal to acquire IBM’s server division.
To be sure, China’s anti-monopoly department has taken its time over the decision and the US
authorities have yet to rule on the acquisition, but Lenovo has said it expects the deal to close sometime
Chief executive Yang Yuanqing said at the annual general meeting in Hong Kong that the company thinks
that its slurps of both IBM’s server business and Google’s Motorola Mobility division should
be completed by the end of 2014.
It also added that national security issues shouldn’t be a problem with America. "We hope
to complete the two deals by year-end," he said.
"The U.S. government and the U.S. Army are all our clients. There has been no problem and we will
keep this tradition," it added.
A report in the Wall Street Journal last week alleged that the IBM deal was being held up
because the U.S. was worried about national security implications.
IBM’s x86 servers are used in nationwide communications networks and Pentagon data centres, familiar
people told the newspaper, and security officials and members of the Committee on Foreign Investments
(CFIUS) are also worried about them being compromised.
The U.S. and China have been trading a 'few shots' on cybersecurity for years now, both accusing
the other’s government and technology companies of corporate spying and intelligence-gathering
for the authorities.
When Lenovo tried to acquire IBM’s PC business in 2005, the firm had to fight for approval
and the computers were eventually banned by the State Department from use on its classified
In other IT news
Oracle said earlier this morning that it now makes its free VM tool better at managing Windows virtual machines and handling
Oracle's new VM Server for x86 is free, but the company isn't throwing the kitchen sink at the
product, as evidenced by the fact that this week it released version 3.3, more than two years after
January 2012's version 3.2 release.
Yet the product has fans who felt that even version 3.2 was sufficiently well-featured to challenge
Vsphere and Hyper-V.
To be sure, the 3.3 version upgrade looks to give Oracle a decent chance of winning more users, thanks to
improved support for Windows guests, Oracle Linux and Oracle Solaris.
Workloads running under the latter operating system can now be pointed at storage sources using
Fibre Channel, iSCSI, ZFS volume, local disk and NFS, which should be welcomed by those who dislike
running separate storage pools for different environments.
Oracle says that it has also tightened security, reduced I/O requirements generated by virtual
machines and simplified network design with new methods to define and operate VLANs.
There's even a new, HTML-5-powered, management console. Oracle's been very busy lately on the
In late June, it released a new version of its virtual compute appliance, a converged
infrastructure play now capable of using more recent Intel chippery, and also announced new ZFS
storage appliances said to be capable of booting 16,000 virtual machines in under seven minutes.
So the question is, will this make Oracle a contender with the leading virtualization services providers?
Get the most dependable SMTP server for your company. You will congratulate yourself!
Share on Twitter.