New group formed to promote standards for the Internet of Things
Share on Twitter.
Get the most reliable SMTP service for your business. You wished you got it sooner!
July 8, 2014
Intel, Samsung, Dell and Broadcom among others, have founded a new group, called the 'Open
Interconnect Consortium' to promote new standards that will help the development of the 'Internet
The new consortium says it “will seek to define a common communication framework based on industry
standard technologies to wirelessly connect and intelligently manage the flow of information
among devices, regardless of form factor, operating system or service provider.”
The new consortium also says “It is our intention to create a specification and an open source
project that will allow interoperability for all types of devices and operating systems.”
So far, we've only got the statement that says “Additional technical details will be announced
at a later time” for now.
The launch comes just six days after Microsoft pledged itself to the Allseen Alliance, another group
that says its aim is “To enable widespread adoption and help accelerate the development and evolution
of an interoperable peer connectivity and communications framework based on AllJoyn for devices and
applications in the Internet of Everything.”
So the question is, are the two groups different? The Open Interconnect Consortium (OIC) offers
the following description of its differences with rivals-- “Today, there are multiple forums driving
different approaches to solve the challenge of IoT connectivity and interoperability. Currently,
we don’t see just one single effort that addresses all the necessary requirements. The companies involved
in OIC believe that secure and reliable device discovery and connectivity is a foundational capability
to enable IoT. The companies also believe that a common, interoperable approach is essential, and that both
a standard and open source implementation are the best route to enable scale.”
That statement seems a little odd as the Allseen Alliance's spiel says its “Members are collaborating
on a universal software framework, based on AllJoyn open source code, that allows devices to autonomously
discover and interact with nearby products regardless of their underlying proprietary technology or
Can the OIC succeed? With just Intel (plus subsidiary Wind River), Dell, Samsung, Broadcom and Amtel
aboard, it trails the Allseen Alliance's fifty members handily.
We are still in the very early days for the Internet of Things, so it's possible that the two
bodies decide they have enough in common to collaborate.
For now, that Microsoft has joined one body and Intel the other may raise some eyebrows, although
with precious little detail of either group's approach available it's difficult to read anything into
the two companies' decisions, at least for now anyway.
In other IT news
It's reported this morning that China's government has finally approved Lenovo’s $2.3 billion
deal to acquire IBM’s server division.
To be sure, China’s anti-monopoly department has taken its time over the decision and the US
authorities have yet to rule on the acquisition, but Lenovo has said it expects the deal to close sometime
Chief executive Yang Yuanqing said at the annual general meeting in Hong Kong that the company thinks
that its slurps of both IBM’s server business and Google’s Motorola Mobility division should
be completed by the end of 2014.
It also added that national security issues shouldn’t be a problem with America. "We hope
to complete the two deals by year-end," he said.
"The U.S. government and the U.S. Army are all our clients. There has been no problem and we will
keep this tradition," it added.
A report in the Wall Street Journal last week alleged that the IBM deal was being held up
because the U.S. was worried about national security implications.
IBM’s x86 servers are used in nationwide communications networks and Pentagon data centres, familiar
people told the newspaper, and security officials and members of the Committee on Foreign Investments
(CFIUS) are also worried about them being compromised.
The U.S. and China have been trading a 'few shots' on cybersecurity for years now, both accusing
the other’s government and technology companies of corporate spying and intelligence-gathering
for the authorities.
When Lenovo tried to acquire IBM’s PC business in 2005, the firm had to fight for approval
and the computers were eventually banned by the State Department from use on its classified
In other IT news
Oracle said earlier this morning that it now makes its free VM tool better at managing Windows virtual machines and handling
Oracle's new VM Server for x86 is free, but the company isn't throwing the kitchen sink at the
product, as evidenced by the fact that this week it released version 3.3, more than two years after
January 2012's version 3.2 release.
Yet the product has fans who felt that even version 3.2 was sufficiently well-featured to challenge
Vsphere and Hyper-V.
To be sure, the 3.3 version upgrade looks to give Oracle a decent chance of winning more users, thanks to
improved support for Windows guests, Oracle Linux and Oracle Solaris.
Workloads running under the latter operating system can now be pointed at storage sources using
Fibre Channel, iSCSI, ZFS volume, local disk and NFS, which should be welcomed by those who dislike
running separate storage pools for different environments.
Oracle says that it has also tightened security, reduced I/O requirements generated by virtual
machines and simplified network design with new methods to define and operate VLANs.
There's even a new, HTML-5-powered, management console. Oracle's been very busy lately on the
In late June, it released a new version of its virtual compute appliance, a converged
infrastructure play now capable of using more recent Intel chippery, and also announced new ZFS
storage appliances said to be capable of booting 16,000 virtual machines in under seven minutes.
So the question is, will this make Oracle a contender with the leading virtualization services providers?
At present, Oracle doesn't rate a mention in studies like IDC's EMEA Quarterly Server Virtualization
With VMware expected to reveal a major vSphere refresh within weeks and rumors starting to emerge that
Microsoft will refresh Windows Server during 2015, it may take more than biennial updates to get
Oracle into the top tier. Then again, we shall see what will happen.
In other IT news
Oracle said this morning that it's moving forward with its Project Jigsaw.
The initiative is a major undertaking that aims to allow Java developers to break their programs
down into independent and interoperable modules.
Initially, Jigsaw was intended to be a major features of Java 8, but by 2012 Oracle decided
that waiting for Jigsaw to be ready would delay the entire Java 8 release, so work on the module
system was postponed until a later version.
Not much has been heard about Jigsaw since, but in a blog post yesterday, Mark Reinhold,
Oracle's chief Java architect, said that the Java Community was ready to begin "Phase Two"
of the Project Jigsaw effort.
"It's now time to switch gears and focus on creating a production-quality design and implementation
suitable for JDK 9 and then Java SE 9, as previously proposed," Reinhold wrote.
Reinhold has drafted a new document outlining the goals and requirements of Project Jigsaw. If
the developers get it right, Reinhold says that Jigsaw will not only make it easier to scale the
Java platform down to small devices, but it will also improve the security, performance, and maintainability
of Java applications.
But it won't be that easy. Back in 2011, when Jigsaw was still expected to be part of Java 8,
Reinhold said it would be a "revolutionary" release, as compared to the more "evolutionary" Java 7.
In the end, the Java 8 we actually got was mostly evolutionary as well, with lambda expressions
being the only truly significant new feature.
And Java 8 arrived two years late, even after cutting loose the Project Jigsaw boat-anchor.
Now work is set to begin in earnest on making Jigsaw ready for inclusion in Java 9, and Reinhold
is once again warning us of the difficulty this project has in store.
Still, he says it's important to press onward. "Jigsaw as a whole will bring enormous changes
to the JDK. It would be unwise to wait until it's completely finished before merging any of it,"
"Our intent is to proceed in large steps, each of which will have a corresponding JEP (JDK Enhancement
Proposal)," he added.
The first three steps will involve determining how to break the JDK down into modules, modularizing
the source code, and then finally modularizing the binary images.
The fourth and last step will be to introduce the module system itself, in the form that
developers will use for other programs outside the JDK.
Oracle is hoping for a 2016 release for Java 9, but given that there were three years between
versions 7 and 8 (even after dropping Jigsaw), that may be a tall order. We'll keep you posted.
Get the most dependable SMTP server for your company. You will congratulate yourself!
Share on Twitter.