MongoDB inks deal with Microsoft and Google
Share on Twitter.
Get the most reliable SMTP service for your business. You wished you got it sooner!
June 26, 2014
MongoDB has inked new agreements that will place the company's NoSQL database into Google and
Microsoft's Cloud data centers.
The company announced on June 24 that it had sealed pacts with the two companies to make it
easier for developers to launch MongoDB databases on top of their respective clouds.
With these two new relationships, MongoDB has gained a foothold in all three of the major clouds.
It already had a relationship with Amazon that made it available on the company's eponymous
By partnering with big internet and software companies, MongoDB has cut the steps it takes
for developers to get the database working in public clouds, with MongoDB now available as an
Add-On in the Microsoft Azure Store, and also via a preview "Click to Deploy" button on Google.
"Fundamentally, we want developers to be able to bring up a MongoDB cluster on any infrastructure
they want very easily," explained MongoDB's CTO, Eliot Horowitz.
"Technically, people have been running databases on their cloud infrastructure for
a while so it was just a matter of the integration," he added.
As any entrepreneur already knows, if you aren't sticking your product in front of users it's hard
to sell it, so MongoDB's deals are a big factor in its broad developer adoption.
These agreements follow a spate of activity in the past few months that has seen the company
join Pivotal's "Cloud Foundry Foundation" to help tie its system closer to the company's eponymous
platform-as-a-service, link its sales and marketing and technology organizations with Hadoop-expert
Cloudera, and team up with IBM to make it easier for MongoDB apps to work with data kept in DB2 and
With the new Google and Microsoft agreements, MongoDB appears just as keen to make its database
prevalent in the cloud as it is to be ubiquitous in on-premises technology.
Though MongoDB isn't yet in the same league as the database incumbents it's trying to displace,
it's doing a much better job of getting its name out than its young rivals DataStax, Couchbase and
In other IT news
Microsoft said earlier this morning that it has fixed a nine-hour service outage in its
online Exchange service that crippled North American customers’ Office 365 and hosted Outlook
The service outage struck companies in the U.S., Canada and Mexico, leaving entire organizations
unable to read, write or retrieve emails or seeing their email slow down to a snail's pace.
Users manned the Office 365 community message boards and Twitter accounts to complain and
vent out their frustration, singling out a flat-footed response from both Microsoft’s technical
and customer service staff dealing with the issues.
Customers were angry at being kept on hold by customer support for up to two hours at a time
and at not being given a set ETA.
Microsoft finally announced that the issues were resolved late Tuesday evening Eastern time.
David Zhang of Microsoft support told the Office 365 community message board-- “Our investigation
determined that a portion of the networking infrastructure entered into a degraded state. Our engineers
made some configuration changes on the affected capacity to resolve end-user impact. The issue
was successfully fixed on June 24, 2014 at 9:50 PM EST.”
Zhang also issued the boilerplate corporate apology for any inconvenience caused but he could
offer little to satisfy users or downplay the magnitude of the problem.
During the day, Jim1001 wrote on the Office 365 community page-- “Our entire corporation cannot
send or receive emails from Outlook (Office 365 Exchange) or even the OWA web browser as of 8 AM MST
time this morning June 24, 2014! I have never seen a world-wide email go down like this before.
MadBuffalo wrote-- “Office 365 is beginning to look like a very poor choice for mission critical
Trec posted-- "Tried to contact support by phone, and after a half hour, the call was dropped on
both occasions. It seems the support guys are saturated and there are not enough staff for an
huge issue like this one."
For many, it was the second outage to Microsoft’s business-cloud service in less than 24
hours and it was proving way too much.
Additionally, Monday saw Lync Online, Microsoft’s unified communications service, slow down and crash.
Lync provides voice over IP, corporate instant messaging, presence, meetings and video conferencing.
Problems surfaced around 11 am EST and were addressed by the Microsoft Lync team via Twitter
later in the afternoon.
Service was restored by 5.30 pm EST. MMS Infotech on Twitter blamed the problem on a botched
data centre migration by Microsoft technicians, moving the relevant network infrastructure.
In other IT news
IT services provider Unisys is the latest firm to test the waters at converged infrastructure,
or something that looks very similar.
To be sure, Unisys actually walked away from proprietary silicon about ten years ago,
concentrating instead on x86-powered ClearPath mini mainframes instead.
In 2013, the company unveiled the first of a new range of servers named “Forward” and today
added four more models to its portfolio.
Models 4150 and 4120 use the Xeon E7 CPU and offer up to 48 and 60 processor cores, respectively,
The new 2080 and 2100 feature the Xeon E5 2600 v2, support up to 16 and 20 processor cores
and up to 12 partitions per node, with 384 gigabytes of memory per partition.
These rigs' nodes connect with an Infiniband backplane connecting them together. Storage
can come from NetApp or EMC, but everything is sold in pre-configured and signed-off sets in
much the same manner as an Oracle's appliances or other converged infrastructure setups.
'Forward' is aimed at applications like ERP that need scale, stability and a vendor with a
track record of running mission critical apps at scale.
Unisys' talk of partitions is a reference to sPar, a mainframe-derived partitioning tool
that the company now says offers containerisation.
Unisys' own twist on the concept Docker has recently made it so popular to run different
operating system instances on one processor, without a hypervisor.
As explained by Vic Herring, Unisys' Australia's ClearPath product manager for APAC and Japan,
s-Par can tap into Intel's VT-x instructions directly.
This arrangement delivers the resource-allocation fun of virtualisation, but with a lesser
Just last week in fact, Unisys made some research available proclaiming that s-Par and
Forward on NetApp storage deliver better and more stable throughput than “an industry-standard
s-Par is currently bundled with Forward, but Herring told us that will change by the end
of 2014 when Unisys publishes reference architectures allowing would-be customers to run up
their own servers.
At that point, s-Par will become something one can buy as traditional software. With interest in
containerisation running popular right now, Unisys will have a job to do explaining how its own version
of the technology differs from Docker's and similar efforts.
In other IT news
It's reported that Russia's government is planning to drop Intel and AMD processors
in favor of locally-developed ARM central processing units.
This would suggest that 3 state-owned Russian hardware companies are forming a partnership
to develop what will soon be dubbed “Baikal”.
The newly proposed initiative would use ARM's 64-bit kernel Cortex A-57 processor as
its base design, offer at least eight cores, and would be built with a 28 nm process.
The new ARM processor would run at about 2 GHz or more in PCs or servers. It's assumed that
Baikal will be delivered to the authorities and state-owned companies sometime in 2014.
Russia's ”central state information agency” ITR-TASS writes that Baikal “will be installed on
computers of government bodies and in state-run firms, which purchase some 700,000 personal
computers annually worth about $500 million and 300,000 servers worth another $800 million.”
ITR-TASS adds that Baikal will find its home in computers run by state-owned entities, suggesting
that there's a national security angle behind the decision.
That's didn't stop blogging site Phoronix from declaring that “For strict security enthusiasts believing
AMD and Intel have been compromised by the NSA or other U.S. agencies, it's time to celebrate.”
Setting aside that kind of thinking, a move to 64-bit ARM processing by entities that collectively
acquire a million devices a year would be significant simply because of the scale it would give
ARM-based servers and PCs in Russia.
But currently, such devices are largely hypothetical to say the least. However, with Amazon Web Services,
Google and Facebook all reported to be considering their own ARM designs to keep their servers'
operating costs down, general interest in that concept is considerable.
Get the most dependable SMTP server for your company. You will congratulate yourself!
Share on Twitter.