MIT and CERN now offer secure email software dubbed Proton Mail
Share on Twitter.
Get the most reliable SMTP service for your business. You wished you got it sooner!
May 22, 2014
CERN alumni and a team or research scientists at MIT have taken another shot at cracking
the e-mail encryption scenario.
Their offering is dubbed Proton Mail and it's now available in public beta, and it proves to be
so popular that the group had to suspend new registrations while it upgrades its system.
As a concept, encrypting email goes back at least to the earliest days of PGP-– Pretty Good Privacy,
that got Phil Zimmerman of RSA Security in so much trouble back in those days. He suffered a long criminal investigation
by the U.S. Customs Service.
After a report from RSA Data Security who were in a licensing dispute with regard to use of the
RSA algorithm in PGP, the United States Customs Service started a criminal investigation of Zimmermann
for allegedly violating the Arms Export Control Act.
The United States government had long regarded cryptographic software as a munition, and thus
subject to arms trafficking export controls. At that time, the boundary between what cryptography
was permitted ("low-strength") and impermissible ("high-strength") for export from the United States
was placed such that PGP fell on the too-strong-to-export side of the boundary.
The boundary for legal export has since been raised and now allows PGP to be exported. The investigation
lasted three years, but was finally dropped without filing charges against Zimmerman.
PGP, which lives on in various open-source tools today, ran encryption alongside users' e-mail
clients and was widely seen as too difficult for the average user.
In the world of Webmail, encryption happens at the server end, and as Lavabit found to its own cost, that leaves user data subject to the demands of law enforcement.
Proton Mail even nods towards PGP-- “In truth, there is not a whole lot that ProtonMail does that
is not already accomplished by PGP, at least from a security standpoint," the MIT team notes.
"But, to quote what Bruce Schneier said to us when he visited CERN, all PGP has demonstrated is that
even one click is too much,” he added.
“What we really want to provide here is privacy for the much larger segment of the population
that isn't sophisticated enough to use PGP,” he added.
Proton Mail is a Webmail system that encrypts messages at the client-side – within the user's browser –
so that the user doesn't have to delegate encryption and trust to the provider.
The organization doesn't log user activity, so information like IP addresses and other metadata
aren't available, and that's what really makes the whole concept so interesting.
It runs AES, RSA and OpenPGP implementations on open source cryptographic libraries, while at the
server end, Proton Mail runs full disk encryption in its Switzerland data centers.
However, the system does demand that users have two passwords-- one to authenticate yourself
with its servers, and the second local password for decrypting messages. We would suggest using a
password manager for the second, since Proton Mail can't re-issue a password that it never held
in its memory to begin with.
There's also an optional self-destruct feature for messages, and users can deal with other e-mail
providers either unencrypted, or using symmetric encryption as an option.
Some of the developers remain at CERN, while others are now at MIT. There's some interviews with
the founders, Jason Stockman, Wei Sun, Andy Yen on the Forbes website.
The developers told Forbes they chose to “bootstrap” rather than seek venture capital funding
to maintain their credibility among users.
In other IT news
There are many that aren't too happy with Microsoft's decision to abandon security patch support for its aging OS Windows XP.
In direct retaliation for its decision, the Chinese government has completely banned Windows
8 from a sizeable amount of public-sector personal computers.
The ban was announced by the government's IT procurement agency in a notice posted online on May 16.
The notice was addressed to hardware vendors bidding on a contract to supply the Chinese state
with new energy-saving PCs, laptops, tablets and other similar equipment.
"All computer vendors are not allowed to install Microsoft's Windows 8 operating system," the
The Chinese government agency behind this decision-– The Procurement Center of the Central Government
Institution of the People's Republic of China has enormous power within the country as it leads
procurement for the Chinese public sector at large.
The outright ban follows a set of Chinese internet giants teaming up in February to offer
support for Windows XP for the next two years following Microsoft halting updates for the legacy
As of the end of 2013, Windows XP had a marketshare of about 50 percent in China. Last December, Chinese
officials were reported to be concerned about the potential security impact of Microsoft permanently dropping
support for the OS.
The Chinese government was also reported to have told Microsoft that halting the sale of Windows
7 and switching over to the higher-priced Windows 8 would lead to software piracy.
"This morning, the Central Government Procurement Center of China posted a notification
titled 'Bidding Process for Government Purchasing Energy-efficient IT Products.' The notification
indicated that the Windows 8 operating system is excluded in the bidding," a Microsoft spokesperson
"We were surprised to learn about the reference to Windows 8 in this notice. Microsoft has been
working proactively with the Central Government Procurement Center and other government agencies
through the evaluation process to ensure that our products and services meet all government procurement
"We have been and will continue to provide Windows 7 to government customers. At the same time, we
are working on the Windows 8 evaluation with relevant government agencies," he added.
But overall, China may not have that many alternatives to Microsoft, given that the country's
homegrown OS "Red Flag Linux" apparently shut its doors and fired all staff in February of this year.
In other IT news
Here's a fact that shouldn't surprise you-- IT depts are spending less on enterprise storage
arrays, and instead are considering shifting to the cloud, if they haven't done so already.
This 4 year old trend was pointed out by Aaron Rakers, managing director of equity research
firm Stifel Nicolaus.
He’s plotted the combined EMC, Hitachi, and IBM storage financial results over time, and his chart
shows a revenue decline since 2010.
Stifel also polled system admins at businesses that have a need for enterprise storage, and found
About 60 percent of respondents thought 2014 storage spending would be greater than that
Over 53 percent of surveyed CIOs and CTOs view cloud computing as the most disruptive technology
to their data centre, followed by software-defined storage and converged compute-storage (32 percent) and flash storage (15 per cent).
About 60 percent of surveyed CIOs and CTOs view EMC as the best positioned company to capitalise on
the data centre transition and trends taking place in the enterprise storage market, while 19 percent
of respondents view NetApp as the best positioned.
Over 58.9 percent expect to evaluate a software-defined storage solution in the next 12 to 18 months.
60 percent view server SAN software as the most attractive.
Rakers concluded by saying-- ``We believe traditional approaches to networked storage appear
to be increasingly misaligned with the performance requirements of virtualised server environments.``
``We would view late 2014/2015 as potentially representing a pivotal period in how investors view
the storage landscape over the next 3 to 5+ years,`` he added.
``We believe that server-side SAN or hyper-convergence represents potentially the most distributive
architectural approach to software-defined storage as this approach is highlighted as being the
closest comparison to Google, Facebook and Amazon.``
Rakers has an “expectation of a two-quarter pause in storage spending; EMC and NetApp have
consistently highlighted a belief that enterprise decision cycles have lengthened”.
In other IT news
Oracle has acquired the desktop software virtualizer GreenBytes, which uses ZFS technology, for
an undisclosed amount.
Overall, GreenBytes' software is based on its own highly rated deduplication engine and replication.
It can run on flash hardware and GreenBytes sold a VDI flash appliance but got out of the hardware business
in August 2013.
It was founded in 2007 by CEO Bob Petrocelli and took in some $37 million in GreenBytes’s exec-contributed
and venture capital funding.
This may suggest that, unless the company was distressed, the backers could have received up to 4 to 5 times the
payout, meaning about $150 to $185 million. That sure sounds like a lot of cash for a SW-only VDI supplier,
especially with Atlantis making waves in the market.
We haven’t had any recent announcements from GreenBytes about its business progress so we can't
tell if it was doing well or not.
There might be some distress here which would reduce the amount of cash or shares that Oracle
paid. Then again, maybe not, it's hard to tell.
The deal announcement said GreenBytes’ technology ”is expected to enhance Oracle's ZFS Storage Appliances,
and that could mean the ZFS appliance getting GreenBytes’ deduplication engine. Oracle said it “is currently
reviewing the existing GreenBytes product roadmap” and will be providing guidance to customers at some
point in time.
Source: The CERN and MIT research teams.
Get the most dependable SMTP server for your company. You will congratulate yourself!
Share on Twitter.
Need to know more about the cloud? Sign up for your free Cloud Hosting White Paper.