LSI offers faster PCIe server flash cards
Share on Twitter.
Get the most reliable SMTP service for your business. You wished you got it sooner!
April 29, 2014
LSI said earlier today that it has added some faster chips to its Nytro PCIe server flash cards. Now, SQL Server 2014 can
run in-memory. LSI's updated Nytro cards provide a server with PCIe-connected flash.
SQL Server 2014 has a Buffer Pool Extension feature that extends into flash memory where it functions as a level 2 cache,
subordinate to the level 1 cache which is DRAM.
That means, where the SQL Server 2014 working set is bigger than the L1 cache, it can avoid going to disk for data it wants
that isn't in the L1 cache and in that manner it can run faster.
SQL Server 2014 will automatically transfer frequently accessed read data into the L2 cache, by writing them into a BPE file.
An Alter Server Configuration command is used to place the BPE file on the Nytro card.
The buffer pool extension feature extends the buffer pool cache with non-volatile storage, usually SSD. Because of this extension, the
buffer pool can accommodate a larger database working set, which forces the paging of I/Os between RAM and the SSDs.
This effectively offloads small random I/Os from mechanical disks to SSDs. Because of the lower latency and better random I/O
performance of SSDs, the buffer pool extension significantly improves I/O throughput, especially when dealing with large databases.
To be sure, Fusion-io's PCIe flash cards can support the BPE feature in SQL Server 2014, and we would suspect there's a set of
Microsoft-certified PCIe flash cards and SSDs for BPE as well as the Fusion-io and LSI Nytro products.
In other IT news
Earlier this morning, IBM said it has launched its new cloud marketplace, a PaaS (platform-as-a-service) web property that offers IBM
and third party a broad base of IT services.
The marketplace has three main elements. The foundation is the familiar SoftLayer infrastructure-as-a-service element, which like competing services
from AWS, Google and Microsoft, allows enterprise customers cloud servers and then discard them when not needed anymore.
A new piece of IBM's cloud is the Bluemix platform-as-a-service play. Bluemix is based on Pivotal's CloudFoundry and offers its
rapid deployment of services that are ready to run apps, as distinct from the IaaS modus operandi of rolling one's own servers.
Overall, Bluemix also offers IBM middleware and new services tailored to big data. The marketplace itself is a SaaS shopfront
blending IBM's own software and that of its partners.
IBM has hinted at most of this for several months already, and the fact that it has now launched the service is a milestone
rather than a revelation.
But this places Big Blue in the cloud game like never before and does so in a powerful way-- the likes of AWS have reached out
to independent software developers to help them deliver cloud subscription services, but IBM has been helping that market get ready
for several years.
Combining PaaS, IaaS and SaaS also gives IBM plenty of depth, again a useful distinction. And another element in IBM's favor is
its deep roots in enterprise IT departments.
Cloud contenders have clearly done well with startups, those that need to operate at web scale and pockets within IT departments.
IBM can now satisfy those users' needs but also conduct conversations that go well beyond infrastructure simplification and cost-cutting.
And of course, IBM has to be in this market-- it's very clear that IT departments are letting go of their on-premises software and equipment
at a rapid rate.
However, it will be interesting to see how much marketing muscle IBM swings behind its new cloud capers and how it positions them
against its competition.
In other IT news
Chinese hardware maker Huawei said today that allegations the company provides backdoors for espionage in its communications equipment
remain unproven and would be commercial suicide.
“The hypothesis that our equipment could be used for espionage by the Chinese government has never been proven,” spokesman Scott Sykes
said at the company’s annual global analyst event in Shenzen.
“If it were ever proven, we would lose 65 percent of our business overnight. That would be corporate suicide,” he added.
As the world’s third largest networking equipment supplier, Huawei has raised several concerns in the internet community.
For instance, Huawei was banned from bidding for contracts for the Australian national data backbone.
But documents disclosed by Edward Snowden this year suggest that Huawei may be more sinned against than sinner. The United States
National Security Agency’s ‘Tailored Access Operations’ managed to break into Huawei’s corporate servers, and by 2010 was reading
corporate email and examining the source code used in Huawei’s products.
“We currently have good access and so much data that we don’t know what to do with it,” boasted one NSA briefing. Worse, the slides
also disclose the NSA intended to plant its own backdoors in Huawei firmware.
A report by Britain’s Intelligent and Security Committee in 2013 was critical of British Telecom, which uses Huawei for its C21
network, for not informing ministers of its decision to use the supplier for what it regards as critical national infrastructure.
But like the U.S. Senate’s report the previous year, the committee offered no evidence of existing back doors.
“The Security Service had already told us in early 2008 that, theoretically, China may be able to exploit any vulnerabilities in Huawei’s
equipment in order to gain some access to the BT network, which would provide them with an attractive espionage opportunity”, the
Overall, Huawei now works with second and third tier phone companies in the United States. It abandoned an attempt to purchase
3Com and says that it doesn’t plan on making any acquisitions in the next ten years.
“Broadly, we have an impeccable track record with 500 telcos in over 150 countries. There's never been a security issue of any
kind,” Sykes told the press. “We wouldn't be a $40 billion company if we're not good at building secure networks. It simply would not
be possible. About sixty-five percent of our business is outside China,” he added.
In other IT news
Oracle has been accused of unfair competition and of breaking U.S. anti-trust laws over its Solaris support division.
The claims are made in a counter-lawsuit lodged by the Solaris Support Group, Terix, which had previously been dragged into
court by Oracle for allegedly stealing the database giant's copyrighted code.
The Terix suit claims that Oracle violated California's unfair competition laws and that it attempted to operate an illegal
monopoly in violation of Section 2 of the U.S. Sherman Act.
It was the same Sherman Act that the U.S. Department of Justice accused Microsoft of violating over the bundling of Windows and Internet
Explorer during that company's antitrust case during the 1990s.
Terix's case has been lodged in the Northern District of California, San Jose Davison. The Terix claim states-- "Oracle's
efforts include (among other things) the use of Oracle's natural monopoly over Solaris patches (including error corrections,
security fixes, and other updates) and Oracle's natural monopoly over firmware for Sun/Oracle hardware to force customers to
purchase software and hardware support from Oracle, even in the many instances when those customers could and would otherwise
obtain superior software and hardware support from third-part service providers such as TERiX at a significantly lower cost."
"Senior Oracle personnel have not only admitted but in fact touted Oracle's intent. Indeed, at a press briefing on the day Oracle
acquired Sun, Oracle's executive vice president of global customer services announced-- "We believe we should be the ones to support
our customers. If you're a third-party support provider offering multivendor support, we're coming to get you," the complaint read.
According to Terix, Oracle has succeeded in undermining and weakening third party providers of software and hardware support,
including Terix, by forcing customers to sign up only with Oracle.
Oracle unleashed its case against Terix and Maintech in July 2013 saying they'd stolen its copyrighted code-- Solaris patches,
updates and bug fixes through their work with customers.
Oracle also accused the two companies of mis-representing themselves to customers by claiming they are allowed to support Solaris.
Oracle wants unspecified damages over copyright infringement, false advertising, breach of contract, intentional interference with
prospective economic relations, and unfair competition.
Oracle saw part of its case thrown out by the judge in January, as the court ruled Terix and Maintech had not duped users by
saying they were allowed to fix and update Solaris.
Get the most dependable SMTP server for your company. You will congratulate yourself!
Share on Twitter.
Need to know more about the cloud? Sign up for your free Cloud Hosting White Paper.